Michael G. Karnavas, J.D. Wright


Vickery on Kiernan

It was with particular interest that I read Liam Kelley’s book review of Ben Kiernan’s Việt Nam: A History from Earliest Times to the Present. Other than the war between the United States and Vietnam, the period leading up to it, and thereafter, I am not particularly familiar with or exceptionally interested in the history of Vietnam. What caught my attention was the author of the book, Ben Kiernan. As I read on, I began reflecting on a conversation I had had with my recently departed friend and historian, Michael Vickery.

According to Vickery, Kiernan asked him some years ago to do a peer review of the first chapter or two of the history of Vietnam Kiernan was writing. Vickery obliged in his characteristic fashion.

Vickery was not a Vietnam specialist, but he was a first-rate historian, well-versed in Southeast Asian history. He also had done a considerable amount of research on the Cham in Vietnam. But above all, Vickery was a purist when he critiqued the work of other historians; he gave no quarter when, in his opinion, the scholarship was sloppy or specious.

To read the rest of this article and to get access to all Mekong Review content, please purchase a subscription by clicking here.

Previous Article

The homeless

Next Article

Monsieur Angkor

More from the Mekong Review